I wonder about this... they force us to upgrade to new versions, which then don t work with critical software, and then ask us to reboot our computers during life-changing tasks. Then when I Desperately need something to work there s a bug that needs to be fixed and no fix in sight. So is this justifiable homicide? It s not like I asked to upgrade, if I had my way I would still be running windows 3.1, the last stable build. But since they forced me into a situation where I was under duress and pressured into violence to vent my frustration, do you think legal people would understand?