Does anyone still think O.J. is innocent?

Question

Not long ago, I had a debate with some woman at the cafeteria at my workplace about Michael Vick. I expressed my opinion that he got a slap on the wrist for what he did. Vick should've gotten a minimal five-year sentence doing hard time for running dog fights. If I was Roger Goodell, he'd be banned from the NFL for life. This woman tried using the same dumbass argument that Stephon Marbury used. She asked me if I was a sportsman and whether or not I hunt. My response was negative, but I explained hunters eat the animals they kill. They don't use little fawns to train the bucks to fight and electrocuted them when they're too injured. They don't lock them in cages and starve them, either. Vick even tried pulling out the race card after he forgot Johnny Cochran died five years ago. Plus, Al Sharpton kept his piehole shut this time because there were no white people involved. I'm not racist, but I get fed up hearing people make a racial issue out of everything. The woman I was debating with was African-American. Finally, I walked away because I didn't want to get in trouble, and it was no use. I should've asked her if she thought O.J. Simpson was innocent, too. Since there are obviously idiots who think what Michael Vick did is acceptable and on the same plane as hunting, I'm asking this other question. Does anyone else out there still think O.J. Simpson is innocent? And if he didn't kill Nicole Brown Simpson, who the hell else did?

Answer 1

The only reason the jury found OJ not guilty was because of that idiot cop Mark Furman who violated a bunch of police procedure and messed everything up by making lots of the evidence be excluded. The jury must make their decision based only on the evidence presented and must find the defendant guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." With all the incriminating evidence excluded it would be difficult to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and if it was discovered the jury used outside sources to make their verdict there would have been a mistrial anyway.



With Michael Vick, I think he honestly was just really really stupid more than anything. I don't think he should have got 5 years - heck manslaughter is only a 7 year sentence usually and that is killing another human. But he probably should have gotten longer than he did.

Answer 2

O.J. is guilty and should have been found so. The fact that he was wealthy and a famous sports person is what kept him out of jail. As for Micheal Vick I will never support any team or use any product he endorses, same for OJ but I don't think we will be hearing from OJ for awhile. Right now there is a campaign to remove OJ's name from the wall of fame at Rich Stadium. My take on it is if these guys get away with it then others think they can too and that the behavior is acceptable. Notice how domestic violence got lots of attention after Nicole Brown was murdered. I have to agree with you fame is the only thing that kept these guys from getting what the average Joe like you or I would have been handed. anybody else would have been put in jail for a very long time,these guys did little or no time at all. And this is justice I think not. I feel horrible for their victims whether they be animal or human and even worse for the families because we as a society failed them.

Answer 3

OJ was found NOT GUILTY, which isnt the same as innocent. Chances are, he would have been found guilty had that cop not botched up the evidence. Everyone knew he was, but that just goes to show the flawed justice system. I think a lot of the criminals should just be put down. But thats a whole other story and one i wont go into on here.

Answer 4

OJ is guilty and the courts knew. God forbid the jury give a guilty sentence and half of LA goes down in flames. I say let it burn.

Answer 5

Not really the answer to your question, as I think it was rhetorical, however what Vick did is really more comparable to the way the food industry treats livestock. They torture and execute them, and it's perfectly legal. Pigs are more intelligent than dogs, aka closer to humans, so why should dogs get special treatment?

Answer 6

Do you imply "or responsible?" And you overlooked Asian. There are handiest 3 races so that you made it extra tricky for not anything. Oh, and there is not any hyphen in African American. And African American isn't a race. Guilty, black.

Answer 7

OJ is guilty and so is Michael Vick.

Answer 8

I think that O.J. is definitely GUILTY and I'm a little sickened that he hasn't been put in prison.

Answer 9

his mother? lol