Bye pals
2010-10-01 03:41:10 UTC
With the result the pendency of cases already reached high, is further hiked and genuine cases of common people are delayed inordinately. Every Chief Justice in the states and the Centre while taking up office talk of ''urgent need'' to take measures to reduce the pendancies, but least little is done so far.
Why no reformation is feasible in this regard? Are the govts not eager to stop these aberrations for some unholy convenience ? For instance, govts declare prestigious projects without actual means to foot the expenditure, only under the confidence that the opposition parties would incite people likely to be dislocated by the project, to file cases and delay the projects endlessly !
Similarly the libel cases are the necesary bulwarks for the deviant ministers, to side track complaints against their misdeeds. Often it is difficult to expose the frauds as they are done carefully to escape audit and publicity. It is not easy to prove these unless with a committed agency which the police is not, being under the mercy of rulers! So it becomes easy for the wrong doers to claim innocence and sue their adversaries for 'defamation' !
At the most, the endless adjournments sought by lawyers to prolong weak cases, could be curtailed. Perhaps, some restriction could be imposed to award only two adjournments except under very special situations. Many cruicial cases of people are dragging for years at the cost of justice and the relief comes so late to the victims that they may not live to receive it!
What are your thoughts about the scope for reformation in timely justice delivery?