Is it legal for two different states to do a review of child support when only one states holds the order?

Question

My husband pays child support to the state of PA, however his ex moved to Vermont and PA sends the money to the child support office of Vermont. Vermont did a child support review two years ago. Now we have new letter from PA wanting to do a reveiw of the child support. Same order is this legal? Vermont did not see a reason for modifying any changes. But Vermont does not hold the order, PA does.

Answer 1

I wasn't sure and found this. Sheds a lot of light on things as my daughters father - aka sperm donor - lives in another state and we've never been able to enforce him paying at all. Hopes this helps answer your question!





A lot of questions surrounding child-support regulations used to come up when the parents lived in different states. The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act has helped clear up a lot of the confusion.



Step 1:

Understand that most states have passed the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, a law that lets courts in different states cooperate with each other and that clarifies what happens when the parties in a support case live in different states.



Step 2:

Know that before this law was passed there was a lot of confusion about child support. Sometimes courts in two different states would order child support payments and the parent would be responsible for paying under both orders.



Step 3:

Realize that under this law, the state where one parent and the child live has the power to issue a support order.



Step 4:

Recognize that, under this act, states cannot interfere with support orders made in the state where one parent and the child live.



Step 5:

Be clear on the fact that one state can modify another state's order only if neither of the parents nor the child live in the issuing state, or if both parents now live in the state where the modification is sought.



Step 6:

Ask the court for a determination of which order applies if you have more than one.



Step 7:

Consider that no matter where a support order is collected or enforced, it will be governed by the laws of the state in which it was issued.

Answer 2

Vermont had no reason to review the matter. The order stays in PA as long as it is the father's legal state of residence. Child Support laws differ by state, so what may be the "correct" amount in Vermont, may not be in PA, Since he is deployed, the review can be delayed until he returns.

Answer 3

baby help whilst mum and dad stay in diverse states is ruled via a Federal regulation, noted as the Uniform Interstate kin help Act, or UIFSA. under the guidelines of UIFSA, the state the place the unique baby help order grow to be filed has persevering with jurisdiction, and is the only state valid for baby help orders, except the two one among you have left the state. she would be in a position to document something she needs, yet her state has no jurisdiction over you as long by using fact the present baby help order is registered on your place state. Your legal experts reaction to any declare she information against you, in her state, must be that that state does not have jurisdiction. If the two one among you progression out of the unique state, then controlling order for baby help could nonetheless proceed to be interior the unique state till it relatively is registered in yet another state for substitute. the guidelines state that the guy who petitions for substitute could desire to do it in the different persons state, so regardless of in case you have been to pass to assert, alaska, your ex ought to not substitute the present help order except she went with the aid of alaska court docket This prevents spouses from state hopping with the intention to get greater help. Dont situation, you're actually not concern to the jurisdiction of her state, if there is already a baby help order accessible.

Answer 4

talk with a Jag lawyer, but as posted above in general after the child has lived six months or more in VT, VT retains jurisdiction over the child, which they did two years ago when they did a review,



since the child is now a resident of Vt not PA, VT should hold jurisdiction at this point over the child