Question:
How do you deal with material that's copyrighted, but the publisher isn't around anymore?
?
2011-02-25 17:47:49 UTC
I was wondering ... there's a lot of music on the website IMSLP that's public domain in Canada, but not in the US. A lot of the publishers don't publish anymore, though. So how would you legally be able to play that music - you can't pay royalties to a company that doesn't exist anymore, and it isn't public domain because it's published after 1923, and the composer obviously hasn't been dead 95 years (1923+95 years = 2018).
Three answers:
Nuff Sed
2011-02-25 20:30:56 UTC
In general, you don't pay royalties to the authors or owners anymore; there are copyright clearinghouses for each industry that will take your money, give you a license, and see if they can find anybody to give the money to... The US Register of Copyrights refers to these as "orphan works", and they currently play an important role in shaping proposed modifications to copyright policies, not to mention the GoogleBooks lawsuit.



That rule about "95 years after death" does not exist in the USA. It is 70 years after author's death, and that only applies for unpublished works, or works created or published after 1977 (with copyright notice required until 1978). If the author was an employee or anonymous, then it is 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is earliest.



It also depends on whether you mean "musical compositions" (sheet music) or sound recordings. For instance, there is no US federal copyright protection for ANY sound recordings published in the US prior to 1972. However, violators can still be sued under STATE laws (common law torts), possibly until 2067 when federal law is set to preempt state copyright laws on those recordings. I would suppose that every new violation restarts the statute of limitations.



If you're concerned about sheet music published between 1922 and 1978, you may need an expert to figure it out for you. There are multiple overlapping rules (publication, notice, registration, renewals) that had to be complied with at the right times. See the Cornell chart linked below for more details.
Dan Brown
2011-02-25 17:50:53 UTC
Whilst the company may not exist anymore, there will be someone, somewhere who owns the licensing rights.
?
2016-06-20 16:46:35 UTC
Well Mic I are attempting to not download whatever if it is to be had right here. I go through legal approach whether it is possible. However, there are generally when that isn't feasible however I still desire to peer it. For illustration, Gundam after battle was once made in the early to mid nineties and nonetheless hasn't reached us for some thing cause. I am beautiful certain it's available in Japan however now not here. If I would get it by legal manner then i'd however I can't. So off to downloading it. It is just human nature. IF you're making whatever free and simply to be had then men and women are going to abuse it. That's simply the best way it is. I neither oppose it. Nor am I for it. It just is considering the fact that how the approach is set up. The reply is to not discontinue downloading but make it more difficult for persons to down load illegally. They don't suppose they have the proper. Simply that they do it anyway. Regardless if it is correct or flawed.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...