Question:
Do you believe O.J. Simpson got away with murder?
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Do you believe O.J. Simpson got away with murder?
Seventeen answers:
loryntoo
2006-10-25 17:01:42 UTC
There was far too much of his blood at the crime scene for it to be there naturally (he had just one small cut on his hand). The argument is that police planted the first set of blood samples they took from him and so sunk their case.



Here's another theory you should really consider. O. J.'s oldest son may have been the murderer and not O. J.

He could have covered up for his son. He could have stood trial to protect his son. That would also explain why he is no closer to finding out who did it.



The last theory is one no one has really investigated. The friend with Nicole had drug problems and gambling problems. It may be that he was the target all along and Nicole was just a potential witness.



If the police had REALLY investigated the murder with an open mind instead of trying to hang it on OJ from the beginning, they might have uncovered the truth. They botched it.
Brian G
2006-10-25 16:55:39 UTC
Yes, I feel he did it but just had the money to hire the best lawyers.
2006-10-25 16:56:59 UTC
He was found not guilty but that does not mean he did not do it. If the glove don't fit acquit!
!Kemberly(:
2006-10-25 16:56:55 UTC
Sure do!
FootballFan1012
2006-10-25 16:56:39 UTC
Definitley. I'd like to stick one of his golf clubs up his butt. Hell with his great football career, He's a god awful person.
Barbara H
2006-10-25 16:55:50 UTC
Absolutely!
moz_head_84
2006-10-25 16:55:22 UTC
He totally did it.
KALEL
2006-10-25 19:04:58 UTC
No question, he did it. The prosecutors tried, but they were no "dream team" such as the defense had. F Lee Bailey, Johnny Cochran, and the shrimp, whats-his-name, Barry Shrek, and Alan Dershowitz, straight from teaching at Harvard Law School.



The bungling cops, headed by the Fuhrer, Mark Furman, handed Simpson the trial on a silver platter.



Remember the quote from Dickens, "If the law thinks that, then the law is a @ss, sir! The law is a @ss!" Sorry if I remembered wrong. David Copperfield, I think.



That trial proved, once and for all, that the law is an @ss.
BetteBoop
2006-10-25 17:02:42 UTC
I believe that he is guilty. I also believe that the media made such a 3 ring circus out of the case that the jury was tainted from the beginning.
Daniella
2006-10-25 16:55:19 UTC
Totally.
2006-10-25 17:04:59 UTC
I wouldn't say he got away. He was found liable in the civil case, and has since been trying to avoid paying out the judgment to the Goldman family.



It's certainly true that he's been markedly unsuccessful in turning in the real killer(s) in Florida.
soulguy85
2006-10-25 17:11:47 UTC
Of course he did and Johnny Cochren has some explaining to do in front of his Maker because DNA doesn't lie.



"Behold, the whirlwind of the LORD goeth forth with fury, a continuing whirlwind: it shall fall with pain upon the head of the wicked."--Jer.30:23
IOU101
2006-10-25 16:59:41 UTC
I watched that trial on my old C Band Satellite live, I taped it when I was not home, I was so into this trial.. 100's of hours of watching and sometimes just listing to it. And I learned, Nothing....



Hell yes he got away with it.
?
2006-10-25 17:00:13 UTC
YES. and he is not paying a dime in his civil case that he lost i guess. I think if it was not for the LA riots. He would be guilty. Period.
nunofyobiznit
2006-10-25 17:06:46 UTC
according to the Cival trial he did it...(period)



the Criminal trial was a joke, LAPD screwed that one up, it should have been declared a mis-trial - if it was, then he most surely would have been found guilty. Wether he did it or not.
MojoMan
2006-10-25 17:01:41 UTC
Yes.
October
2006-10-25 16:58:32 UTC
He did it


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...